Legal Opinion

Scott Seldin v. Theodore Seldin

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 2, 2018No. 17-1045, 17-1047PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

In 2010, feuding members of the Seldin family entered into a Separation Agreement to divide jointly owned assets. Thé Separation Agreement contained an arbitration clause, ‘requiring the parties to arbitrate any claims involving their jointly owned property. Rather than arbitrating, Appellant Scott Seldin (“Scott”) filed a lawsuit for an accounting of a trust that he claims was not included in the Separation Agreement. The district court dismissed his claim, finding that the federal courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear the lawsuit. We disagree.

I. Background

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Cawley v. Celeste (In Re Athens/Alpha Gas Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Lee Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  5. A.H. Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Midwest Bus Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. A Better Way to Buy, Inc. v. Ashley Furniture Industries, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  2. Allied Seed, LLC v. Norfarm Seeds, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  3. Andrew Taylor Thompson v. Pioneer Bank & TrustDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
  4. Ballou v. Asset Marketing Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  5. Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API