Legal Opinion

Bank of Mobile v. Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1844PublishedCited by 14 opinions

EeRoe. to the Chancery Court of Mobile. Motion to dismiss the writ on the ground, that the decree is not final, but interlocutory merely.

1Opinion of the CourtOrmond, J.

The bill was filed by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, and others.

The bill, in substance, alleges the purchase, by the complainant, of one S. Andrews, of several lots in the city of Mobile, at the price of <$20,000, payable in four instalments, for which notes were executed. That the first note was paid ; about which time Andrews became insolvent, and absconded. That, at the time of the purchase, there was an incumbrance on the land for the sum of ten thousand two hundred dollars, secured by a deed of trust, which, although recorded, he was ignorant of. That the land was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bates v. Bank of the StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. Weatherford v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Garner v. PrewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Jones v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. McKinley v. IrvineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API