Bartholomew v. Union Trust Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Superior Oourt of Marion County (54,629); James M. Leathers, Judge. Intervening petition by Pliny W. Bartholomew against the Union Trust Company as receiver of the Mutual Life Insurance Company. Erom a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Roby, J.- —
-The trial court sustained the receiver’s demurrer for want of facts to an intervening petition for an allowance by Pliny W. Bartholomew, who declined to plead further, and appeals from the judgment thereupon rendered against’him. The facts upon which the intervenor founds a claim against the estate for services as an attorney at law are, in effect, as follows: One Iluter intervened in the receivership case, and asked that a bond and mortgage given by him to the insolvent company be found paid and ordered canceled. The conclusions of law were against him. He appealed to the Supreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Huter v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Ober & Sons Co. v. Macon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Miedreich v. RankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Saunders v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Haas v. Wishmier's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Hoffman v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.