Legal Opinion

Koons, Wilson & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 13, 1918No. 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8069 (T. D. 37216). [Oral argument Dec. 6,1917, by Mr. washburn and Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

Three separate shipments of clay, one during the life of the act of 1909 and the other two since the act of 1913 took effect, were imported by the appellants. Those imported under the act of 1909 were assessed at the rate provided by that act for unwrought clays and those imported under the act of 1913 were assessed under a like provision of that act. The paragraphs under which the assessments were made are substantial’^ similar except as to the rate qf duty, and we quote paragraph 90 of the act of 1909 as.follows:

90. Clays or earths, umvrought or unmanufactured, not specially provided for in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maltus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Breck & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. InnisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Rochester Last WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API