Brobst v. Brobst
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Aenold,
Defendant appeals from the decree of the court below, in equity, dismissing his petition to open a decree pro confesso and also making final a decree nisi entered after hearing. His sole contention is that the court had no jurisdiction to try title to realty.
Plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife and are separated. The wife’s complaint alleged that she and defendant “are the owners as tenants by the entireties” of designated realty in defendant’s sole possession, and that the deeds “have never been recorded and are ... in the possession of the Defendant.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maxwell v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Mower v. MowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- DeBernard v. DeBernardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- New York Life Insurance v. SekulaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hack v. HackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Ray v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.