Legal Opinion

Malaske v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 2004No. F-2002-1085Published

1Opinion of the Court

89 P.3d 1116 (2004)

2004 OK CR 18

John William MALASKE, Appellant

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-2002-1085.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 21, 2004.

Todd Burlie, Ponca City, OK, counsel for appellant at trial.

Brian Surber, Assistant District Attorney, Newkirk, OK, counsel for the State at trial.

Lee Ann Jones Peters, Norman, OK, counsel for appellant on appeal.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, Nancy E. Connally, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, OK, counsel for the State on appeal.

OPINION

LUMPKIN, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant, John William Malaske, was tried by…

Also in this document: Dissent · Chapel; Dissent · Strubhar.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Willingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Franks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Diaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API