Legal Opinion

Manson v. Ficara

New York District Court

Decided February 23, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John D. Capilli, J.

The plaintiff has moved by motion to this court for an order dismissing the defendant’s counterclaim. Said motion is hereby granted without prejudice to the defendant’s right to commence a separate action thereon.

A primary action was commenced by the plaintiff, Robert E. Manson, in the Small Claims Part of this court on January 4, 1983 to recover for property damage to his motor vehicle. The defendant, Anthony J. Picara, served an answer denying the allegations set forth in the plaintiff’s small claims summons and, at the same time, interposed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayden v. L.I.L. Co.New York District Court · 1982
  2. Mohammad v. Gibraltar TransmissionsNew York District Court · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marino v. N.A.S. Plumbing & Heating Contractors, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API