Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thompson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1980No. 1607PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the sentence imposed by the lower court was excessive. We cannot reach this issue, however, because this appeal is untimely.

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. He did not file any post-verdict motions. On November 9, 1978, the lower court imposed sentence. On November 20, 1978, appellant filed a petition for modification of sentence. The lower court denied the petition on that date. * On December 15, 1978, appellant filed this appeal from that order.

This case is controlled by Commonwealth v. Wilkinson, 260 Pa.Super. 77, 393 A.2d 1020…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. WilkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. VillalozSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API