State v. Penland
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant William D. Penland was convicted of manslaughter in the shooting death of Marcia McIntyre. We affirm.
Appellant asserts the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on alleged improper remarks by the solicitor during closing arguments. We disagree.
Although counsel objected to the remarks of the solicitor during closing arguments, a motion for a mistrial was not made until after the verdict. One may not preserve a vice until he learns what the result will be and then, take advantage of the error on appeal. State v. Burnett, 226 S. C. 421, 85 S. E.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. GambrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.