Compañía Mercantil Arroyana v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Franco Soto
The question raised in the motions for dismissal filed by the appellee and by the receiver, who had been joined as a party after the notice of appeal had been filed, is whether the appeal should be dismissed because notice of the appeal was not given to the receiver.
The judgment was rendered on February 14, 1924, and on March 10, 1924, on motion of the appellee, the court made an order that the receiver of the plaintiff corporation, who had been appointed on February 16, 1924, he joined and considered as a party to the action.
In construing section 296 of the Code of Civil Procedure on which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Scannell v. FeltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915