Legal Opinion
Merriman Construction Co. v. County of Geauga
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 18, 1983No. Civ. A. No. C81-578PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, owners of real estate in Bainbridge, a township in Geauga County, won declaratory judgments in Ohio state courts reversing local government administrative actions and zoning enactments that blocked their plans to construct high-density housing. In this action they repeat their allegations that they were deprived of property rights in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and seek damages and attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3) and 1988.
Pending before the Court are Motions to Dismiss for failure to state a claim filed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- TETON PLUMBING & HEAT., INC. v. Board of Trustees, Laramie County School District Number OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1988