Legal Opinion
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. Rivenburgh
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided November 30, 2001No. Civ.A. 2:01-0770PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are (1) Defendants’ (the Corps’) motion for change of venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to the Eastern District of Kentucky, and (2) motions by Kentucky Coal Association, Pocahontas Development Corporation, and AEI Resources, Inc. to intervene as defendants. For reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the Corps’ motion for change of venue. The motions of Kentucky Coal Association and Pocahontas Development Corporation to intervene are GRANTED.1
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This civil action alleges violations of Section 1344…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. RivenburghDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. RivenburghDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- Sierra Club v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021