Legal Opinion
City of Minneapolis v. Rand
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1923No. Nos. 5882-5884PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
Erom a decree fixing rates to he charged for gas in the city of Minneapolis, separate appeals are prosecuted by the Minneapolis Gaslight Company (hereafter called company or gas company), the receivers of that company, and the city of Minneapolis. Franchises had been granted to predecessors of the gas company, permitting the manufacture and distribution of gas to the city and to its citizens for a limited period, and allowing the city to purchase the plant at certain times. The gas company acquired these franchises and the gas plants, and shortly before the date when…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.