Minard v. Boss Hotels Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMantz, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.
The action was at law and for malicious prosecution. When both sides rested the court sustained a motion for a 'directed verdict made by the defendant, sustaining it on the sole ground that the plaintiff’s evidence failed to show that the prosecution was instigated by the defendants. In so ruling the lower court held that as a matter of law plaintiff, in that particular, had not made out a case sufficient to warrant a submission to the jury. The court stated that it was not necessary to pass upon the other grounds of the motion. The issue thus raised…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Hughes v. Van BruggenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Halligan v. Lone Tree Farmers ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Davis v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.