Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Henel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1929Published

1Dissent

Edgcomb, J. (dissenting).

The question involved in this action is whether the defendants Henel have been released from their obligation upon the bond and mortgage in suit. When they sold the mortgaged property to the defendant Lutz, and she promised and agreed to pay the mortgage debt, she became the principal debtor and the Henels became sureties. If, after that relation had been created, plaintiff extended the time of payment of the bond and mortgage in suit -without the knowledge or consent of the sureties, they became discharged from their obligation. The question of what injury, if any,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cresco Realty Co. v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Pizer v. HerzigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Hothorn v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Hothorn v. . LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Ost v. MindlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API