Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1927No. 3405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above).' Appellant’s contention that the court below was 'without jurisdiction of the suit is on the theory that it was not com-, menced there within the time required by provisions in section 5 of article 8307, R. S. 1925, as follows:

“Any interested party who is not willing and does not consent to abide by the final ruling and decision of said [Industrial AeeidentJ Board shall within twenty days after the rendition of said final ruling and decision by said Board give notice to the adverse party and to the Board that he will not abide by said final…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hood v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Harris v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. HayesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Tinkle v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. BoatnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API