Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McComb v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1904No. 13,478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to furnish facilities for shipping grain.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus in this court. On the 22d day of August, 1903, O. W. M cOomb, a farmer, living about 4 miles from Wilsonville, *594in Furnas county, Nebraska, began the business of buying and shipping grain at Wilsonville in competition Avith 2 elevators there situated, one OAvned by S. A. Austin and the other by the Central Granaries Company, a corporation. From the day he began business until about September 5, he obtained all the cars from the respondent necessary for the carrying on of his business. He alleges in his application that, on or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. Washington Territory Ex Rel. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Runge v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Anderson v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Anderson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Luben v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Crandall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Dobney v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API