Legal Opinion

State v. Hess Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 25, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 226 N.J.Super. 256 (1988). The issue on the appeal, as circumscribed by the dissent below, is whether the condemnation award included any compensation to the franchisor “based upon any loss of the business opportunity or goodwill” within the meaning of the Federal Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2802(d)(1); and if so, whether the waiver clause should be stricken as unconscionable.

Although the question of the franchise-holder’s waiver of any right to participate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Exxon Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. State v. Hess Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Passaic v. ShennettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Heir v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  3. Com'r of Transp. v. Nat. AmusementsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. State v. Jan-Mar, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Township of West Windsor v. NierenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API