In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Peighton Miller v. Tulane Lakeside Hospital
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
hWe granted the plaintiffs’ writs in these consolidated cases to review the appellate court’s interpretation of Medical Malpractice Act (“MMA”) provision LSA-R.S. 40:1231.8(A)(2)(b) (formerly LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47(A)(2)(b)), 1 directing |2that a request for review of a malpractice claim “shall be deemed filed on the date of receipt of the request stamped and certified by the division of administration.” • The Louisiana . Division of Administration (“DOA”) maintains and the appellate court agrees that Section 1231.8(A)(2)(b) requires that a request for review to be “stamped and certified” by the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Crichton; Concurrence · Guidry.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- LeBreton v. RabitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Borel v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Holly & Smith v. St. Helena Cong. FacilitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Mkts. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of GloverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Truxillo v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Couvillion v. MatherneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- 23rd Psalm Trucking, L.L.C. v. Madison Parish Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2025
- Correro v. FerrerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.