Legal Opinion
People v. Ramos
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 2010No. 56 SSM 56PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered on the charges of scheme to defraud in the first degree and petit larceny, and the present indictment otherwise dismissed without prejudice to an application by the People, if they be so advised, for leave to resubmit the charge of grand larceny in the fourth degree to another grand jury (see People v Steadman, 82 NY2d 1 [1993]; People v Mayo, 48 NY2d 245, 253 [1979]).
The trial court erred when it admitted hearsay evidence without a proper foundation (CPLR 4518 [a]). Even assuming…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SteadmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. HuntsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Jianrong Wang v. Shao KeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Citizens Ins. Co. of Am. v. CMS Risk Mgt. Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- HUNTSMAN, CRAIG A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.