Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilbert Bryant Foerster

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1972No. 71-2620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from his conviction of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a, relating to transporting marihuana, and of conspiracy to violate the same section. We affirm.

Appellant contends that the marihuana introduced as evidence should have been suppressed as the product of a search and seizure not supported by probable cause. This court has consistently upheld the right of Immigration officers to stop and investigate vehicles for concealed aliens, as was done here, without a showing of probable cause. United States v. Almeida-Sanchez, 452 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1971); Duprez v. United States, 435 F.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frank Thomas Fumagalli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Condrado Almeida-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Gene Duprez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Roy Aranda and Virginia Varela De ArandaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. John Thomas DalyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Foerster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API