Legal Opinion

United States v. Drishti

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 9, 1993No. SS 84 Cr. 499-4 (VLB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

The above defendant has moved for relief from his sentence under former Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the ground that at the time of sentencing, the special parole term of fifteen years I imposed was unauthorized. I deny the motion.

At the time of the defendant’s offense, distributing one kilogram of heroin on or about January 4, 1981 in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812 and 841, the special parole *751term was authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). This provision was no longer in effect at the time of sentencing. 98 Stat. 2030 (1984).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barbara Walberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. FigueroaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API