Watson v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
In this appeal we consider the evidence required to prove and disprove that a claimant is a “displaced” worker under the workers’ compensation law. A displaced worker is a partially disabled claimant who is deemed to be totally disabled because he is unable to work in the competitive labor market as a result of a work-related injury. A claimant who is not prima facie displaced, has the burden to prove that he made a reasonable job search, but was unable to obtain employment because of his disability. If a claimant satisfies that burden, the employer may rebut that evidence by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Chrysler Corporation v. DuffSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Franklin Fabricators v. IrwinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Adams v. Shore Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Keeler v. Metal Masters Foodservice Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. PernicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. PernicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Warren v. Amstead Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2019