Legal Opinion

Watson v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 21, 2011No. 442, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider the evidence required to prove and disprove that a claimant is a “displaced” worker under the workers’ compensation law. A displaced worker is a partially disabled claimant who is deemed to be totally disabled because he is unable to work in the competitive labor market as a result of a work-related injury. A claimant who is not prima facie displaced, has the burden to prove that he made a reasonable job search, but was unable to obtain employment because of his disability. If a claimant satisfies that burden, the employer may rebut that evidence by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. DuffSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Franklin Fabricators v. IrwinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. Adams v. Shore Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Keeler v. Metal Masters Foodservice Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. PernicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. PernicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Warren v. Amstead Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API