Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1989No. A89A1426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

Lamar Simpson appeals his conviction for armed robbery. He contends on appeal that the in-court identification of him by a witness was “based on impermissibly suggestive procedures that led to the misidentification of Lamar Simpson”; and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Held:

1. The basis of appellant’s contention as to “impermissibly suggestive” procedures that led to misidentification by witnesses in court, is that the photograph of Simpson shown to two witnesses in a photo lineup was, because of its unusual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Devane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Sparks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Widner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Baugher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Nguyen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API