Legal Opinion

Jisu Cha v. Hiossen, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 12, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00691Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JISU CHA, JAEHYUN KIM, and Case No. 2:23-cv-00691-WLH-PD JUN-HYUN KIM, Individually and as 13 successors-in-interest to JIHUN KIM, Decedent, ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 14 TO REMAND [33] AND Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT HIOSSEN, INC.’S 15 MOTION TO DISMISS [20] v. 16 17 HIOSSEN, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation; WILLIAM E. SHIN aka 18 EUN HO SHIN, an individual, and DOES 2-30, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Neither party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney 23 with five years or less of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gompper v. Visx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API