Jisu Cha v. Hiossen, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JISU CHA, JAEHYUN KIM, and Case No. 2:23-cv-00691-WLH-PD JUN-HYUN KIM, Individually and as 13 successors-in-interest to JIHUN KIM, Decedent, ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 14 TO REMAND [33] AND Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT HIOSSEN, INC.’S 15 MOTION TO DISMISS [20] v. 16 17 HIOSSEN, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation; WILLIAM E. SHIN aka 18 EUN HO SHIN, an individual, and DOES 2-30, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Neither party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney 23 with five years or less of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gompper v. Visx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.