United States v. Roberts
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1ConcurrenceByrne, Judge
Senior Judge Gladis’ opinion is irrelevant insofar as it attempts to distinguish and narrow United States v. Thomas, 45 C.M.R. 908 (N.C.M.R.1972), because, whether Lieutenant Commander Groat was detailed defense counsel or individual military counsel, he was present and so was the defense counsel detailed for this trial. United States v. Snow, 10 M.J. 742 (N.C.M.R.1981), and United States v. John, 12 M.J. 821 (N.M.C.M.R.1981), are also irrelevant as the original counsel was not made available in those cases.
The individual military counsel’s motion for what appeared to be an indefinite…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. SnowU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. JohnU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981