Legal Opinion · Dissent

Forbes v. St. Martin

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 5, 2013No. 2010-CA-00380-COAPublished

1DissentIrving, P.J.

¶ 108. In this case, James R. Forbes filed suit against his attorney, Louis St. Martin, and St. Martin’s law firm, St. Martin, Mahoney & Associates, alleging legal malpractice, fraud, and conversion. On June 8, 2007, St. Martin6 filed a motion for summary judgment, which the Harrison County Chancery Court granted.

¶ 109. In this appeal, Forbes frames the issue in the summary-of-the-argument portion of his brief as follows:

This case is not a traditional legal malpractice case where a client contends that the attorney’s handling of the legal matter fell below the standard of care resulting in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Pierce v. CookMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tyson v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Darby v. Mississippi State Board of Bar AdmissionsMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API