Legal Opinion

East Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Roman Forest Consolidated Municipal Utility District

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1981No. C-346PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment construing two contracts. Under the first contract, Roman Forest agrees to furnish fresh water to East Montgomery. Under the second contract, Roman Forest agrees to provide sewage treatment services for East Montgomery. This lawsuit concerns what expenses Roman Forest may charge East Montgomery under each contract. The trial court rendered a judgment for East Montgomery. The court of civil appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for Roman Forest. 619 S.W.2d 1.

The two contracts were signed in April, 1975. The first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Harris v. RoweTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Roman Forest Consolidated Municipal Utility District v. East Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company Lp v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC and Amber Harvest, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Al's Formal Wear of Houston, Inc. v. Sun, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. General Accident Insurance v. Unity/Waterford-Fair Oaks, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Bandera Drilling Co., Inc. v. Sledge Drilling Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  5. Maples v. ErckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API