Legal Opinion

Pratt v. . Coman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1868PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, upon the conceded facts of this case, must be regarded, in law, a bona fide holder, for value, of the note upon which this action is brought. I do not deem it important to inquire, in this case, whether the receipt of the note in suit by the plaintiff, and the surrender to Agnew of his note, to take up which this note was received by the plaintiff, was, under the facts, as found by the referee, a discharge and satisfaction, or payment, of the debt of which the note surrendered by the plaintiff was the evidence. The general rule of presumption, it seems to me, should be, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Bank of Salina v. BabcockNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Brown v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Douglass v. WilkesonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Youngs v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Ph&338nix Insurance Company v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. O'Brien v. . FleckensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Paddon v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Mech. Farmers' Bank of Albany v. . WixsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API