Legal Opinion

Braeutigam v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 27, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari to the Monmouth Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

An indictment for perjury having been brought into this court by a writ of certiorari, a motion is now made that it be quashed. The motion must prevail. That which is charged does not constitute an offence, while the offence that is probably meant is not charged.

The averment of the indictment is that a certain suit at law in an action upon contract against the defendant was pending in a court competent to try the cause, and that thereupon, with respect to a material question between the parties, the defendant made a false affidavit and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Linden Park Blood Horse Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NealNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  2. State v. WintersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. MorroughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API