Legal Opinion

Bagwell v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1933No. 1169PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellee instituted this suit upon a promissory note executed by appellant,, and for the foreclosure of a deed of trust lien covering sixty-five acres of land given for the purpose of securing said note. The only defense made by appellant to the cause of action asserted by appellee was that the deed of trust lien was void', because the property covered thereby was a homestead. No fact issue was raised by the evidence and, by agreement of parties, the jury was discharged and the cause decided by the trial judge. Appellant has presented some question with regard to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lacy v. RollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Astugueville v. LoustaunauTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hensel v. International Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Dabney v. SchutzeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Bateman Bros. v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BagwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API