Bagwell v. Hunt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HICKMAN, Chief Justice.
Appellee instituted this suit upon a promissory note executed by appellant,, and for the foreclosure of a deed of trust lien covering sixty-five acres of land given for the purpose of securing said note. The only defense made by appellant to the cause of action asserted by appellee was that the deed of trust lien was void', because the property covered thereby was a homestead. No fact issue was raised by the evidence and, by agreement of parties, the jury was discharged and the cause decided by the trial judge. Appellant has presented some question with regard to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lacy v. RollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Astugueville v. LoustaunauTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Hensel v. International Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Dabney v. SchutzeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Bateman Bros. v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunt v. BagwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955