Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harvey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1908No. Appeal, No. 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 11, March T., 1908', by defendant, from order of Q. S. Dauphin Co., Jan. T., 1906, No. 57, discharging rule to remit forfeiture in case of Commonwealth v. Frank Harvey and the Title Guaranty & Trust Compáúy of Scranton. Rule to remit forfeiture of recognizance. Before Kunkel, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order discharging rule to remit forfeiture.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is styled an appeal of The Title Guaranty & Trust Company of Scranton, Pennsylvania, from the judgment of the court of quarter sessions of Dauphin county, refusing to remit a forfeiture of the appellant’s recognizance, duly entered into, conditioned for the appearance of the defendant, Frank Harvey, in the said court, and to abide the order thereof and not *237depart the court without leave. The record shows that the recognizance was duly forfeited in open court on January 11, 1906.

In Commonwealth v. Flomenhaft, 3 Pa. Superior Ct. 566, we held, as stated in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FogelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Foulke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Commonwealth v. BasendorfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReeherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. JakubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Philadelphia v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. Iskoe (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. EmersonDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API