Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lehman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1993No. 380 M.D. 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Before us in our original jurisdiction are preliminary objections filed by Joseph D. Lehman, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections (Respondent), filed in response to a *137“Complaint in Mandamus” filed by Harold X. Smith. Smith alleges that on July 26, 1991, while incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford he was assaulted by two corrections officers and that the Superintendent at Graterford and his staff sought to cover up the alleged assault. Smith also alleges that he has filed an inmate grievance on the matter and requested an investigation and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mueller v. PA. STATE POLICE HDQTRS.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Awkakewakeyes v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API