Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Walls
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Appeal from judgment denying peremptory writ of mandate under section 1094.5, Code of Civil Procedure. Petitioner sought reversal or annulment of decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which held that the Sears, Roebuck and Company voluntary plan of unemployment compensation disability benefits (established pursuant to § 3251 et seq. of Unempl. Ins. Code Ann.) shall reimburse the state’s Unemployment Compensation Disability Fund (per § 2712 of said code) the amount of benefits paid by it to Sears’ former employee Grace V. Myers. The petition for mandate included a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- West v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- King v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hoover Community Hotel Development Corp. v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ready v. GradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.