Legal Opinion

Neary v. Tower Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the defendant Lincoln Brokerage Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. *921Rivera, J.), dated February 3, 2006, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the action was not time-barred. The causes of action accrued and the relevant statutes of limitations began to ran on August 5, 2002, the date the Tower Insurance policy at issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mauro v. Niemann Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. St. George Hotel Associates v. ShurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Vic Char Realty, Inc. v. Alliance Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Balloon & Novelty Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Tucker v. M & T Insurance Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API