Legal Opinion
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Gittens
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 28, 2005No. 02-7106, 03-7190, 03-7195PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge.
Several years ago, an agency of the District of Columbia sponsored a city-wide, outdoor exhibit of polyurethane models of donkeys and elephants, each painted and decorated by a different artist. The exhibit lasted five months. The parties to these consolidated appeals argue about whether, as the district court ruled, the agency violated the First Amendment to the Consti*418tution when it rejected a design showing a circus elephant weeping…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. Federal Government of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals, Inc. v. GittensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Nader v. the Democratic Nat. CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- State v. RooneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.