Legal Opinion

Pattavina v. DiLorenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered September 22, 2004, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since the conduct, based on allegations of injuries resulting from physical therapy, “ constitute [d] medical treatment or b[ore] a substantial relationship to the rendition of medical treatment” (Bleiler v Bodnar, 65 NY2d 65, 72 [1985]; see also Levinson v Health S. Manhattan, 17 AD3d 247 [2005]), plaintiffs complaint sounded in malpractice and the action was properly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Levinson v. Health South ManhattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. FogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Ryan v. KornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API