Legal Opinion

Reltool Service Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1954No. 49474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Chief Judge

The plaintiff sues for $111,052.56, which allegedly represents losses incurred in the performance of a subcontract under a prime contract with the government for the production of 60 mm. shells. The suit is based on the Lucas Act, 60 Stat. 902, 41 U. S. C. 106 note, as amended, 62 Stat. 992. The plaintiff is referred to hereinafter as Plasco, the name by which it was known during the contract period involved.

The issue presented by this case is whether the provision of the Lucas Act restricting recoverable losses to those “incurred * * * without fault or negligence on [the part of a plaintiff]…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  2. McGann Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milwaukee Engineering & Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API