Fruehauf Corp. v. United States

Newman, Judge:

Defendant has moved in accordance with rule 6.5(a) for an order compelling plaintiff to further respond to certain written interrogatories directed to plaintiff on March 6, 1979, concerning which plaintiff has interposed objections. Under all the facts and circumstances, and for the reasons indicated below, defendant’s motion is denied.

The relevant background affecting this application is as follows:

On August 10, 1978, defendant moved to dismiss the instant action on the ground that it purports to cover two protests that were previously summoned by plaintiff in court No.…