Legal Opinion

J. A. Wigmore Co. v. Chapman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. 19119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

This is an action brought by a real estate broker to recover a commission claimed to have been earned by finding a purchaser for a 99-year leasehold estate. The property was owned by the Wigmore Company, a corporation of Cleveland, the plaintiff in error, and defendant in error, Chapman, was the broker. Chapman brought an action to recover commission, claiming that he had entered into a verbal contract with the Wigmore Company to find a buyer for the leasehold estate; that the Wigmore Company had fixed the selling price at $50,000, and had agreed to pay him a commission fixed by the real…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Biggs v. Bernard, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Howard Investment Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Hornback v. Sabin Robbins Paper Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Muhlfelder v. Rieth & Antonelli Co.City of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API