Legal Opinion

Girard Trust Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 18, 1979No. 45-78PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

This federal estate tax refund case is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Both parties submit there are no material facts in dispute and we agree. The posture of the case is unique in the sense that the parties are in agreement that there was an overpayment of estate taxes which plaintiffs are entitled to have refunded. The parties also are in agreement as to the amount of the refund. The disagreement in the case is over whether the form in which the Government made the refund is lawful (more precisely, whether an overpayment of estate taxes, which were paid…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Berg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. In Re CarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Girard Trust Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Rey v. Guy Gannett Publishing Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API