Legal Opinion

Kuriansky v. Bed-Stuy Health Care Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiffs made a sufficient showing to satisfy both CPLR 1312, which governs provisional remedies in CPLR article 13-A civil forfeiture actions, and CPLR 6201 and 6301, which provide for attachments and preliminary injunctions in other types of civil actions. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by granting plaintiffs’ motions for provisional relief under CPLR articles 13-A, 62 and 63.

Defendants’ present claim — that…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Bikowicz v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. New York State Crime Victims Board v. T.J.M. Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Rauss v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Nelson v. StanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API