Legal Opinion
Freyn Engineering Co. v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 10, 1935No. 6335PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing appellant’s bill on the ground that the 3 claims presented under section 4915, Rev. St., as amended (35 U. S. C. § 63 [35 USCA § 63]), are unpatentable.
We reproduce claim 1 as illustrative: “The method of operating a stationary firfe tube boiler whose tubes are less than 3 inches in diameter and more than 1% inches in diameter and the length of which tubes bears a ratio to internal diameter in excess of 75 to 1, which consists in flowing waste heat gases through said tubes at a velocity such that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- DeForest Radio Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grant v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ide v. Ball Engine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Cullen-Thompson Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944