Legal Opinion
Richard F. Davet v. City of Cleveland, Robert Vilkas and City of Cleveland Department of Building & Housing
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2006No. 05-3832PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
In 2003, the City of Cleveland condemned, then partially demolished, a building owned by Richard Davet. In response, Davet filed a lawsuit in state court against the city and several other defendants, alleging that the demolition violated the Takings, the Due Process and the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. The defendants filed a counterclaim seeking an injunction (compelling Davet to remedy the code violations or complete the demolition) and over $16,000 in damages for the cost of the partial demolition. The defendants removed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Brown v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Green Party of Tennessee v. Tre HargettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Evans v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- First American Title Co. v. DevaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lausin Ex Rel. Lausin v. BishkoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.