Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Weber

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1997No. 97APA06-777Published

1DissentPeggy Bryant, Judge

Because I disagree with the majority’s disposition of this matter, I respectfully dissent.

Applying the strict language of R.C. 2943.031(D), the majority concludes that the trial court must be reversed and instructed to vacate the guilty plea appellant entered in this matter in 1990. Moreover, concluding that the statute is substantive, not procedural, the majority finds the Rules of Criminal Procedure inapplicable to appellant’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea for lack of the stated warnings under R.C. 2943.031.

Since its inception, Crim.R. 11 has governed the procedure for ensuring that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. HeydenOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API