Legal Opinion

Durham v. Flannagan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1883No. 1532PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Gregg County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 22. Motion for new trial. When the grounds set forth in a motion for new trial, in justice’s court, are verified by the affidavit of the party, and the same are *28not controverted, the statements in the motion are to be considered as prima facie true, and if the grounds are sufficient the motion should be granted.

§ 23. Pleading; new and additional .in county court on appeal from justice's court; trial of right of property; Curry v. Terrell (W. & W. Con. Rep. p. 95) explained. It was not intended that the rule announced in Ourry v. Terrell should apply to a party who,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weight v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Belt v. RaguetTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Wootton v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Osborn v. KoenigheimTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manigault v. BryanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Den v. CrawfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1825
  3. Kean's Lessee v. RoeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1836
  4. Adams v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1833
  5. Hicks v. PeguesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API