Legal Opinion

Toler v. Murray

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 2004No. 1021956 and 1021957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donna Hammers Toler seeks appellate review of an order of the Calhoun Probate Court denying her petition to probate a will. We hold that she is entitled to relief.

The facts are undisputed. On April 16, 2003, Claude Lehman Hammers executed a self-proving instrument purporting to be his last will. Hammers died on June 12, 2003. On July 21, 2003, Toler, the executrix designated in the document, petitioned the Calhoun Probate Court to admit the will to probate.

On August 11, 2003, although no one had challenged the petition, Probate Judge Arthur C. Murray denied it. His order stated, in pertinent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Fontaine Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Smith v. ViceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. State ex rel. C.M. v. C.H.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Barnes v. WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Guardianship of LambWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Hill v. KruseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Ex parte Raymond Adams, as coexecutor of the estate of Clifford Wayne ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  5. Adams v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API