Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 1989No. 88-2085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the claimant contends that te deputy erred in refusing to extend the firefighter’s presumption statute, section 112.18(1), Florida Statutes (1987), to his claim. We affirm.

The claimant is a retired firefighter who served the City of Miami for twenty-six years. A physical examination of the claimant conducted before he began his service revealed no indication of heart disease. Fifteen months following his retirement, however, claimant suffered a heart attack. Claiming disability due to heart disease, claimant sought workers’ compensation benefits. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lansford v. Broward County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Pensacola v. WinchesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. City of Clearwater v. CarpentieriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. St. Lucie FCRD and PGCS v. FMIT, Florida Municipal etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Michael Guglielmo v. State of Florida-DOC Zephyrhills C I/Division of Risk ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API