Smith v. State

LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge:

concurring in part/dissenting in part.

I concur in the affirmance of the judgment and sentence for Theft of Credit Cards After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies. However, I disagree with the overruling of Stanfield v. State, 666 P.2d 1294 (Okl.Cr.1983). As we have found that the principles established in Stanfield have no application to the case at hand, it is not necessary for us to overrule it.