Legal Opinion

Henningsen v. Township of Randolph

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 N.J. Super. 82 (1986)

518 A.2d 503

LLOYD HENNINGSEN AND IRA AYERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, RANDOLPH EQUITIES, A PARTNERSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 17, 1986.

Decided November 24, 1986.

Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and STERN.

Richard I. Clark argued the cause for appellants (Dolan & Clark, attorneys; William M. Cox and Richard I. Clark, on the brief).

John P. Jansen argued the cause for the respondent Township of Randolph (Villoresi & Jansen, attorneys;…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BrunettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Funeral Home Mgmt. v. BasralianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Anfuso v. SeeleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Elco v. RC Maxwell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. New Hope Baptist Church v. SommerhalterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API